The Formation of American Cinema in the 1920s

The 1920s marked a transformative era for American cinema, characterized by the establishment of the studio system—a framework that would dominate the industry for decades. This period, often referred to as the “Golden Age” of Hollywood, saw the consolidation of film studios as powerful entities that controlled every aspect of filmmaking, from production to distribution.

The Studio System Era

At the core of the studio system was the concept of vertical integration, where the major studios not only produced films but also controlled the distribution networks and owned a significant number of theaters across the United States. This control over the infrastructure—studios, laboratories, and equipment—ensured that the studios could produce films efficiently and on a large scale. Raw materials such as film stock were often bought in bulk, and the studios owned extensive backlots that could simulate diverse settings and environments, reducing the need for location shooting.

Talent as Studio Assets

One of the defining features of the studio system was its approach to talent. Actors, directors, screenwriters, and other creative personnel were often under exclusive contracts to specific studios. These contracts bound the talent to the studio for a fixed number of films and years, making them essentially employees of the studio. This practice allowed studios to control their films’ artistic elements tightly and build consistent and recognizable brand images, often typified by the kind of stars and stories they promoted.

Financial Control

Financing in the studio system was internally generated. Studios funded their films through revenues obtained from their extensive theater chains and from renting films to independently owned theaters. The financial clout of major studios allowed them to undertake lavish productions and manage the risk associated with filmmaking more effectively. Every dollar earned at the box office was a return on their own investments, incentivizing studios to produce films that were both artistically appealing and commercially viable.

Distribution and Marketing

Distribution and marketing were also managed in-house. Studios employed extensive promotional strategies, including exclusive releases, national advertising campaigns, and coordinated release schedules. They controlled not only how a film was marketed but also where and when it was shown, allowing them to maximize audiences and profits. The ability to directly manage the distribution also meant that studios could enforce practices like block booking, where theater owners were required to book a package of films from a studio instead of selecting individual titles.

Cinemas and the Growth of Studio Power in the 1920s American Cinema

During the 1920s, the American film industry experienced a transformative expansion, particularly in the realm of cinema ownership and the consolidation of studio power. This period marked the maturation of the studio system, characterized by vertical integration, which significantly impacted how films were distributed and how revenues flowed back to the studios.

Studio Ownership of Cinemas

One of the pivotal aspects of the studio system was the ownership of cinemas. Major studios owned a significant portion of the theaters across the United States, which meant that they controlled not only the production and distribution of films but also their exhibition. This complete control over the film supply chain allowed studios to keep most of the revenue generated from film showings. As the cost of cinema operations and film production increased, the financial stakes grew higher, prompting studios to expand their control over more theaters.

Mergers and Expansion

The increasing costs associated with running cinemas and producing films led to a wave of mergers and acquisitions within the industry, culminating in the formation of the “Big Seven” studios that dominated Hollywood: MGM, Paramount Pictures, RKO, Warner Bros., 20th Century Fox, Universal Studios, and Columbia Pictures. These studios not only produced and distributed films but also owned the theaters where their films were shown, creating an economically insulated environment that maximized their profits and market control.

Going Public and the Role of Investors

As the scale of the industry grew, these studios began to require more substantial capital injections to fund their expansive operations. Many studios turned to the public stock market to raise this capital, attracting investments from banks and wealthy individuals. The influx of capital from public investors allowed the studios to produce more elaborate and costly films and expand their theater chains further.

Economic Dynamics Post-World War I

The end of World War I in 1918 brought a significant demographic shift with returning soldiers and a public eager for entertainment, increasing the demand for film as a popular leisure activity. Cinemas, especially those located in downtown areas, became cultural hotspots. However, the cost of building and maintaining these cinemas was substantial, pushing the studios to grow even larger to meet the financial demands of their expanding operations.

The film industry, much like other manufacturing sectors, found it economically viable to standardize certain operations. The creation of films followed certain established models which helped streamline production and reduce costs. This standardization made it easier to predict box office performances and manage large-scale production schedules, reinforcing the studios’ ability to control the market effectively.

Deepen Your Knowledge with these books:

Newsletter

Get Your Free Video Marketing for Filmmakers Ebook